How the O4B Scorecard Works
Instructions
Looking at binocular pages one at a time, it gets difficult to remember specifications
to make comparisons. To facilitate that process, the Optics4Birding Scorecard allows
you to select up to four binoculars and compare them side by side. Select binoculars
while surfing the site, or from the menus on the scorecard page. All binoculars
have certain specifications such as minimum close focus, eye relief or such. We
took all the specifications that apply to binoculars and gave each rating within
the range of values possible for that specification, a score from 1 (lowest) to
10 indicating our evaluation how that binocular ranks for that specification. The
Scorecard then totals all the scores for each binocular selected, giving an overall
comparison. Since not everyone has the same preferences in binocular traits, the
O4B Scorecard lets you apply your own preference factor for each specification.
Preference factors range from 10 (most important) to 0 (irrelevant). On your first
visit, the preference factors will all be set to 5, the intermediate score. You
can change these factors to fit what you want in a binocular. The raw scores are
multiplied by the preference factors, personalizing the scores to the way you use
your binoculars. Note: the Scorecard does not apply to image-stabilization binoculars,
whose weight and cost (among other factors) is governed by the image-stabilization
technology in ways that invalidate the scoring mechanism.
Setting Preference Factors
When setting your preference factors, it is essential to remember that all binocular
designs are a set of compromises required by the physical laws that govern optics.
For example, it is impossible to get very short close focus, wide angle of view,
and long eye relief at the same time, or to make a binocular with a large objective
lens and low weight without using expensive materials. Set your preference factors
high for the parameters that are important to you. Don't set them all to 10 to try
and find the perfect binocular. We divide the total score by the number of non-zero
preference factors, so setting them all to 10 gives the same relative score as setting
them all to any other number.
On every visit, you will be able to check a box to save your current preferences
in a cookie so they are there the next time you visit. (Optics4Birding believes
that cookies should be for the convenience of visitors only. We use the information
in cookies only to make your visit easier. We do not set cookies without your permission,
and do not use the data in the cookies for any other purpose.)
Scoring Criteria
Each parameter in the O4B Scorecard is scored by a method appropriate for that parameter.
For some, we were able to write an equation that describes how we think the scores
should fall. For others, scores have to change at different rates in different parts
of the range. For these, we decided on scores and entered them into a reference
table. Either way, we feel these scores are representative of how most birders knowledgeable
about optics would judge each parameter. To help you determine which parameters
are (or should be) important to you, each parameter links to its respective discussion
in the All About Optics section of this website.
Eye Relief
Eye relief for all binoculars, of any magnification, ranges from about 10mm up to
25mm. Eye relief longer than 22mm has negative side effects, making it harder to
keep ones eyes aligned with the image. Eyeglass wearers need a bit more eye relief,
but too much still has the same problem. We therefore use reference tables with
different scales depending on whether you wear eyeglasses.
|
Eye Relief
|
Without Glasses
|
With Glasses
|
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
1
|
1
|
|
11
|
2
|
1
|
|
12
|
4
|
1
|
|
13
|
5
|
1
|
|
14
|
6
|
2
|
|
15
|
8
|
3
|
|
16
|
9
|
4
|
|
17
|
10
|
5
|
|
18
|
10
|
6
|
|
19
|
10
|
7
|
|
20
|
10
|
8
|
|
21
|
9
|
9
|
|
22
|
8
|
10
|
|
23
|
6
|
9
|
|
24
|
4
|
7
|
|
25
|
2
|
5
|
When using the scorecard, set the importance factor to 0 for any parameter that
doesn't apply to you.
Close Focus
Outstanding binoculars, usable for insect study, can focus as closely as 3 feet,
but anything below 6 feet is exceptional. Marine binoculars and other field glasses
can only focus to 20 feet or more. This range is normalized so that 5 feet or less
scores 10 and 23 feet scores 1, with the formula:
12½ - (CF / 2)
Weight
Higher power binoculars tend to be heavier than lower power binoculars, but weight
can also add stability if the binocular is well balanced. Regardless, too much weight
can cause fatigue after a long day in the field. Our scoring function is non-linear
and discontinuous, so we address it with a reference table.
|
Weight
|
Score
|
|
|
|
|
<25
|
10
|
|
26
|
9.5
|
|
27
|
9.0
|
|
28
|
8.5
|
|
29
|
8.0
|
|
30
|
7.0
|
|
31
|
6.0
|
|
32
|
5.0
|
|
33
|
4.5
|
|
34
|
4.0
|
|
35
|
3.5
|
|
36
|
3.0
|
|
37
|
2.5
|
|
38
|
2.0
|
|
39
|
1.5
|
|
40+
|
1.0
|
Field of View
The field of view is usually measured by the width (in feet) of the visible field
at 1,000 yards distance. This field is directly related to power, so that higher
power binoculars have a narrower field of view. To compare binoculars of differing
magnification, we can calculate the apparent angle of view, which is the angle the
observer sees when as if standing at the actual distance divided by the magnification
rather than looking through the binoculars. Except for subcompact binoculars, this
apparent angle ranges from about 45° to about 70° (with 65º and above being considered
“wide angle”). Field of view is given a discontinuous scoring system for several
reasons. First, while having a wide field of view can be useful, it isn’t necessarily
an unmixed blessing. Frequently, truly wide-angle binoculars suffer somewhat in
clarity and sharpness because of the optical compromise made in the design in order
to provide that panoramic field. Accordingly, we have given the widest field binoculars
somewhat lower scores to reflect this tendency.
|
Apparent Angle
|
Score
|
|
|
|
|
<45
|
1
|
|
46
|
2
|
|
47
|
3
|
|
48
|
3
|
|
49
|
4
|
|
50
|
5
|
|
51
|
5
|
|
52
|
6
|
|
53
|
6
|
|
54
|
7
|
|
55
|
7
|
|
56
|
8
|
|
57
|
8
|
|
58
|
9
|
|
59
|
9
|
|
60
|
10
|
|
61
|
10
|
|
62
|
10
|
|
63
|
10
|
|
64
|
9
|
|
65
|
9
|
|
66
|
8
|
|
67
|
8
|
|
68
|
7
|
|
69
|
7
|
|
>70
|
6
|
Waterproofing
The levels of waterproofing are not a continuum, but discrete levels. Porro prisms
get lower scores at the same level of waterproofing because their external focusing
mechanisms cause wear to the waterproofing seals. Thus, we assign the following
scores:
none = 1
shower-proof = 3
waterproof porros = 5
waterproof roofs = 7
nitrogen-purged porro = 7
waterproof and nitrogen-purged roofs = 10
Eyecups
Eyecups are rated for durability, comfort, and adjustability.
rubber = 3
slide-up = 4
slide-up and lock = 5
twist-up = 7
wrap-around = 8 (if not an eyeglass wearer)
twist-up with detents = 10
Lens coating
Lens coatings are rated by the number or percentage of lens surfaces that are coated.
none = 1
coated = 4
multi-coated = 7
fully multi-coated = 10
Prisms
With prisms, ratings evaluate both the material in the glass and the coatings.
BK-7 = 3
BaK-4 = 6
Phase Coated = 8
Exotic Phase Coated = 10
Class
Scaled from 0.2 (lowest quality) to 1.0 (top quality) in steps of 0.2, this factor
is used to give a balance between optical quality class and price, and is multiplied
by the score from all the other factors to give a final score. In most cases, Class
is determined by manufacturer’s suggested retail price (MSRP), binoculars of scopes
that are particularly better or worse than their MSRP might indicate they have
their Class adjusted to the appropriate level.
|
MSRP
|
Score
|
|
|
|
|
$1.00 - $99.00
|
0.2
|
|
$100.00 - $249.00
|
0.4
|
|
$250.00 - $599.00
|
0.6
|
|
$600.00 - $999.00
|
0.8
|
|
$1,000.00 - $2,000.00
|
1.0
|
Scorecard | Introduction
|