How the O4B Scorecard Works
Instructions
Looking at binocular pages one at a time, it gets difficult to
remember specifications to make comparisons. To facilitate that process, the
Optics4Birding Scorecard allows you to select up to four binoculars and compare
them side by side. Select binoculars while surfing the site, or from the menus
on the scorecard page. All binoculars have certain specifications such as
minimum close focus, eye relief or such. We took all the specifications that
apply to binoculars and gave each rating within the range of values possible
for that specification, a score from 1 (lowest) to 10 indicating our evaluation
how that binocular ranks for that specification. The Scorecard then totals all
the scores for each binocular selected, giving an overall comparison. Since not
everyone has the same preferences in binocular traits, the O4B Scorecard lets
you apply your own preference factor for each specification. Preference factors
range from 10 (most important) to 0 (irrelevant). On your first visit, the
preference factors will all be set to 5, the intermediate score. You can change
these factors to fit what you want in a binocular. The raw scores are
multiplied by the preference factors, personalizing the scores to the way you
use your binoculars. Note: the Scorecard does not apply to image-stabilization
binoculars, whose weight and cost (among other factors) is governed by the
image-stabilization technology in ways that invalidate the scoring mechanism.
Setting Preference Factors
When setting your preference factors, it is essential to remember
that all binocular designs are a set of compromises required by the physical
laws that govern optics. For example, it is impossible to get very short close
focus, wide angle of view, and long eye relief at the same time, or to make a
binocular with a large objective lens and low weight without using expensive
materials. Set your preference factors high for the parameters that are
important to you. Don't set them all to 10 to try and find the perfect
binocular. We divide the total score by the number of non-zero preference
factors, so setting them all to 10 gives the same relative score as setting
them all to any other number.
On every visit, you will be able to check a box to save your
current preferences in a cookie so they are there the next time you visit.
(Optics4Birding believes that cookies should be for the convenience of visitors
only. We use the information in cookies only to make your visit easier. We do
not set cookies without your permission, and do not use the data in the cookies
for any other purpose.)
Scoring Criteria
Each parameter in the O4B Scorecard is scored by a method
appropriate for that parameter. For some, we were able to write an equation
that describes how we think the scores should fall. For others, scores have to
change at different rates in different parts of the range. For these, we
decided on scores and entered them into a reference table. Either way, we feel
these scores are representative of how most birders knowledgeable about optics
would judge each parameter. To help you determine which parameters are (or
should be) important to you, each parameter links to its respective discussion
in the All About Optics section of this website.
Eye Relief
Eye relief for all binoculars, of any magnification, ranges from
about 10mm up to 25mm. Eye relief longer than 22mm has negative side effects,
making it harder to keep ones eyes aligned with the image. Eyeglass wearers
need a bit more eye relief, but too much still has the same problem. We
therefore use reference tables with different scales depending on whether you
wear eyeglasses.
| Eye Relief |
Without Glasses |
With Glasses |
|
|
|
|
10 |
1 |
1 |
|
11 |
2 |
1 |
|
12 |
4 |
1 |
|
13 |
5 |
1 |
|
14 |
6 |
2 |
|
15 |
8 |
4 |
|
16 |
9 |
6 |
|
17 |
10 |
7 |
|
18 |
10 |
8 |
|
19 |
10 |
9 |
|
20 |
10 |
10 |
|
21 |
9 |
10 |
|
22 |
8 |
10 |
|
23 |
6 |
9 |
|
24 |
4 |
7 |
|
25 |
2 |
5 |
When using the scorecard, set the importance factor to 0 for any
parameter that doesn't apply to you.
Close Focus
Outstanding binoculars, usable for insect study, can focus as
closely as 3 feet, but anything below 6 feet is exceptional. Marine binoculars
and other field glasses can only focus to 20 feet or more. This range is
normalized so that 5 feet or less scores 10 and 23 feet scores 1, with the
formula:
12½ - (CF / 2)
Weight
Higher power binoculars tend to be heavier than lower power
binoculars, but weight can also add stability if the binocular is well
balanced. Regardless, too much weight can cause fatigue after a long day in the
field. Our scoring function is non-linear and discontinuous, so we address it
with a reference table.
|
Weight |
Score |
|
|
|
<25 |
10 |
|
26 |
9.5 |
|
27 |
9.0 |
|
28 |
8.5 |
|
29 |
8.0 |
|
30 |
7.0 |
|
31 |
6.0 |
|
32 |
5.0 |
|
33 |
4.5 |
|
34 |
4.0 |
|
35 |
3.5 |
|
36 |
3.0 |
|
37 |
2.5 |
|
38 |
2.0 |
|
39 |
1.5 |
|
40+ |
1.0 |
Field of View
The field of view is usually measured by the width (in feet) of the
visible field at 1,000 yards distance. This field is directly related to power,
so that higher power binoculars have a narrower field of view. To compare
binoculars of differing magnification, we can calculate the apparent angle of
view, which is the angle the observer sees when as if standing at the actual
distance divided by the magnification rather than looking through the
binoculars. Except for subcompact binoculars, this apparent angle ranges from
about 45° to about 70° (with 65º and above being considered “wide angle”).
Field of view is given a discontinuous scoring system for several reasons.
First, while having a wide field of view can be useful, it isn’t necessarily an
unmixed blessing. Frequently, truly wide-angle binoculars suffer somewhat in
clarity and sharpness because of the optical compromise made in the design in
order to provide that panoramic field. Accordingly, we have given the widest
field binoculars somewhat lower scores to reflect this tendency.
|
Apparent Angle |
Score |
|
|
|
<45 |
1 |
|
46 |
2 |
|
47 |
3 |
|
48 |
3 |
|
49 |
4 |
|
50 |
5 |
|
51 |
5 |
|
52 |
6 |
|
53 |
6 |
|
54 |
7 |
|
55 |
7 |
|
56 |
8 |
|
57 |
8 |
|
58 |
9 |
|
59 |
9 |
|
60 |
10 |
|
61 |
10 |
|
62 |
10 |
|
63 |
10 |
|
64 |
9 |
|
65 |
9 |
|
66 |
8 |
|
67 |
8 |
|
68 |
7 |
|
69 |
7 |
|
>70 |
6 |
Waterproofing
The levels of waterproofing are not a continuum, but discrete
levels. Porro prisms get lower scores at the same level of waterproofing
because their external focusing mechanisms cause wear to the waterproofing
seals. Thus, we assign the following scores:
none = 1
shower-proof = 3
waterproof porros = 5
waterproof roofs = 7
nitrogen-purged porro = 7
waterproof and nitrogen-purged roofs = 10
waterproof and argon-purged roofs = 10
Eyecups
Eyecups are rated for durability, comfort, and adjustability.
rubber = 3
slide-up = 4
slide-up and lock = 5
twist-up = 7
wrap-around = 8 (if not an eyeglass wearer)
twist-up with detents = 10
Lens coating
Lens coatings are rated by the number or percentage of lens
surfaces that are coated.
none = 1
coated = 4
fully coated = 5
multi-coated = 7
fully multi-coated = 10
Prisms
With prisms, ratings evaluate both the material in the glass and
the coatings.
BK-7 = 3
BaK-4 = 6
Phase Coated BaK-4 = 8
Exotic Phase Coated BaK-4 = 10
Class
Scaled from 0.2 (lowest quality) to 1.0 (top quality) in steps of 0.2, this
factor is used to give a balance between optical quality class and price, and
is multiplied by the score from all the other factors to give a final score. In
most cases, Class is determined by manufacturer’s suggested retail price
(MSRP), binoculars of scopes that are particularly better or worse than their
MSRP might indicate they have their Class adjusted to the appropriate
level.
|
MSRP |
Score |
|
|
|
$1.00 - $99.00 |
0.2 |
|
$100.00 - $249.00 |
0.4 |
|
$250.00 - $599.00 |
0.6 |
|
$600.00 - $999.00 |
0.8 |
|
$1,000.00 - $2,000.00 |
1.0 |
Scorecard |
Introduction
|